Acquire AI is the funding discovery and grant intelligence suite within Aubree, the Philanthropic Intelligence Platform. It autonomously searches funding databases, scores opportunities by mission alignment using an Intelligent Fit Score algorithm, and surfaces the highest-probability grant prospects for your organization — eliminating the manual, high-friction grant hunt that consumes development staff time with low-yield results.

How does Acquire AI's Intelligent Fit Score work?

Acquire AI uses natural language processing (NLP) to analyze your organization's mission statement, program descriptions, geographic focus, and population served, then matches these against the stated priorities of thousands of foundations and government funding sources. Each opportunity receives an Intelligent Fit Score that ranks alignment — so your team only pursues grants where the probability of success is high.

How does Acquire AI fit into the Philanthropic Intelligence Platform?

Acquire AI is the funding growth layer of Aubree's four-suite Philanthropic Intelligence Platform. It works in direct partnership with StewardWise AI — insights about which programs are resonating most with current donors inform the funding searches Acquire AI runs, creating a synergistic growth loop between donor retention and new funding acquisition.

How is Acquire AI different from grant databases nonprofits already use?

Traditional grant databases require a development director to manually search, read, and evaluate each opportunity. Acquire AI inverts this: instead of your staff hunting through hundreds of listings, an autonomous AI engine continuously monitors funding landscapes and proactively delivers ranked, mission-matched opportunities directly to your team — turning a reactive research process into a predictive intelligence function.

What types of funding does Acquire AI discover?

Acquire AI searches across foundation grants, corporate philanthropy programs, government funding sources, and community foundation opportunities. It continuously monitors for new funding announcements and deadline alerts, ensuring your organization never misses a high-fit opportunity due to limited research bandwidth.

What results can nonprofits expect from Acquire AI?

Organizations using Acquire AI typically see a significant reduction in time spent on grant prospecting, an increase in application quality due to better mission alignment, and access to funding opportunities they would not have discovered through manual research. The platform is designed to function as a full-time grant research analyst operating 24/7.

Is Acquire AI available in a bundle?

Yes. Acquire AI is the core of the Revenue Optimizer bundle, paired with StewardWise AI to create a complete retention-plus-acquisition growth engine. It is also included in the full Aubree Philanthropic Intelligence Platform.

Impact Summary Generator · Agent 07 · StewardWise AI | Aubree

Agent 07 · Reporting Intelligence · StewardWise AI

Your Q1 Board Report Used to
Take 12 Hours. Watch What Happens in 30 Seconds.

Impact Summary Generator turns your raw program data into board-ready and funder-ready summaries simultaneously. Same data. Two documents. Two audiences. Two frames. 30 seconds, not 12 hours.

Your program data is already generating the report. You just have not connected them yet. This is the connection.

Board version and funder version generated from the same data. Different frame for each.
Executive summary, key outcomes, donor impact statement, strategic recommendation.
Grant impact report with theory of change narrative and next-period funding request.
12-hour reporting process becomes a 30-second draft and a 15-minute refinement.

30 sec From data to report

12 hrs Previous process eliminated

2 Audience versions simultaneously

Same data Different frame for each audience

Get Started

Your Executive Director Is Spending 12 Hours Every Quarter Turning Data into Documents That Two Different Audiences Cannot Both Use.

The Q1 board report and the Q1 grant impact report contain the same underlying data. 47 students served. 84% completion rate. 23 on the waitlist. One symposium presenter. $45,000 in donor-funded expansion. The numbers are identical. The documents are completely different, and writing both from scratch takes 12 hours that your Executive Director does not have in a week that also includes a board meeting, two major donor calls, and a staff review.

The board version needs an executive summary with strategic context, outcomes measured against targets, a donor impact statement that connects the numbers to specific relationship moments, and a forward-looking recommendation the board can act on. The funder version needs a theory of change narrative, grant compliance outcomes tracked against deliverables, specific attribution connecting funder investment to program results, and a next-period funding request that sets up the renewal conversation. Neither document can be written by copying from the other.

Impact Summary Generator takes the raw program data and generates both documents simultaneously in 30 seconds. The Executive Director spends 15 minutes reviewing and refining instead of 12 hours writing from scratch. The board gets the clarity they need to make governance decisions. The funder gets the compliance narrative they need to renew the grant. The same data. The right frame for each audience. Done before the board meeting starts.

Q1 2026 STEM Data. Board Version. Funder Version. Both in 30 Seconds.

Impact Summary Generator · Q1 2026 · STEM Academy

StewardWise AI · Agent 07 · Reporting Intelligence

0:28

Generated in

Raw Program Data Input · Q1 2026

Students served

84%

Completion rate

Waitlist

Symposium presenter

$45,000

Donor expansion funding

Target: 50

Q1 enrollment goal

2 reports generated · Board version · Funder version · Same data Different frame for each audience

Board Report · Q1 2026

Audience: Board of Directors · Governance Frame

Executive Summary

Q1 STEM Academy delivered strong outcomes against target with 47 students served at 84% completion. Program demand exceeds current capacity with 23 students on the active waitlist. The cohort produced one regional symposium presenter, the first from the program. Donor-funded expansion of $45,000 positions Q2 for waitlist reduction.

Key Outcomes vs Targets

Students served 47 vs 50 target

Completion rate 84% vs 80% target

Regional recognition 1 vs 0 target

Donor Impact Statement

Sarah Chen's $45,000 gift funded the cohort expansion that enabled the 47th seat. That seat produced the program's first regional symposium presenter. When notified, Ms. Chen stated: "This is exactly why I give." This outcome represents the highest-quality retention and upgrade conversation available for Q2 cultivation.

Strategic Recommendation

Board action requested: authorize Q2 waitlist reduction initiative targeting 10 additional seats at $2,500 per seat. Current demand signals a $25,000 funding gap that, if addressed in Q2, positions the program for 40% enrollment growth by Q3 year end.

Grant Impact Report · Q1 2026

Audience: JPMorgan PRO Neighborhoods · Compliance Frame

Theory of Change Narrative

JPMorgan PRO Neighborhoods investment in the STEM Academy activates the economic mobility pathway identified in the original grant proposal. Q1 demonstrates that access to structured technology education at the secondary level produces measurable postsecondary and workforce readiness outcomes within a single program cycle.

Grant Deliverables · Q1 Compliance

Participants enrolled 47 grant req: 40

Program completion 84% grant req: 75%

Regional recognition 117% above projection

Funder Attribution

JPMorgan PRO Neighborhoods funding directly enabled 12 of the 47 Q1 seats through the workforce development allocation. Marcus Johnson, a PRO Neighborhoods-funded seat recipient, presented at the Maryland STEM Symposium in March 2026, demonstrating the workforce readiness outcome specified in grant deliverable 3.2.

Next Period Funding Request

Based on Q1 outcomes exceeding all grant deliverables and an active waitlist of 23 students, we respectfully request continuation funding of $120,000 for Q2 to Q3, enabling waitlist reduction and expansion to the second program site identified in year two of the original proposal.

Same Data. Two Documents. Zero Contradiction. 30 Seconds.

47 students. 84% completion. One symposium presenter. $45,000. Every number is identical across both reports. The frame changes everything about how each audience receives it. Impact Summary Generator writes both frames simultaneously without ever contradicting the underlying data.

12 hrs

Previous time to produce both reports manually. Writing, formatting, checking, revising. Two separate documents from the same data.

0:30

Time to generate both reports from raw program data. Draft quality ready for 15-minute review and refinement. Not 12 hours of writing.

15 min

What the Executive Director spends on reporting now. Review, refine, send. The writing is already done before they open the document.

Board-Ready. Funder-Ready. Generated Simultaneously.

Board Version. Governance Frame.

Executive summary with strategic context. Outcomes measured against targets with visual indicators. Donor impact statement connecting the numbers to specific relationship moments. Forward-looking strategic recommendation the board can vote on. The board receives clarity, not volume, and the clarity is built from the actual program data rather than from memory and intuition.

Funder Version. Compliance Frame.

Theory of change narrative connecting funder investment to program outcomes. Grant deliverables tracked against the original proposal with percentage completion for each. Specific attribution of funder dollars to named program outcomes. Next-period funding request calibrated to what the compliance data supports. The renewal conversation begins before the grant cycle ends.

30 Seconds. Not 12 Hours.

The 12-hour reporting process is 12 hours because the Executive Director is doing four things simultaneously: retrieving data from multiple systems, synthesizing it into narrative, framing it differently for two audiences, and formatting two documents to professional standards. Impact Summary Generator does all four simultaneously. The Executive Director does the 15-minute review.

Expandable for Boards That Want More Detail

The default output is the summary because boards make better governance decisions with clarity, not volume. Every section is expandable to full detail for boards that want to review the complete program data underlying each outcome statement. The summary is the starting point, not the ceiling. Additional detail is one click away from the draft.

Donor Impact Statement Built In

The board version includes a donor impact statement that connects the program data to specific donor relationships. Sarah Chen's $45,000 gift enabled the 47th seat that produced the symposium presenter. That statement is not written from scratch. It is generated from the relationship data in the donor file cross-referenced against the program outcomes. The board sees the donor relationship strategy in action through the program numbers.

Your Program Data Is Already Generating the Report.

You just have not connected them yet. This is the connection.

The raw data exists. 47 students. 84% completion. $45,000 in donor funding. One symposium presenter. It is sitting in your program database, your CRM, and your donor tracking system right now. Impact Summary Generator connects those systems and writes both reports from the data that is already there.

From 12 Hours of Writing to 15 Minutes of Review

Without Impact Summary Generator

Executive Director spends 12 hours compiling Q1 board report from multiple data sources
Board version and funder version written separately from the same underlying data
Data retrieval, narrative synthesis, dual-audience framing, and formatting all done manually
Report delivered to board with 48 hours to review instead of a week because writing took too long
Funder compliance report written after the board report because there was no time for both
Donor impact statement omitted because connecting program data to donor relationships requires separate research
12 hours per quarter on reporting is 48 hours per year the Executive Director is not fundraising

With Impact Summary Generator

Both reports generated from raw program data in 30 seconds
Board version and funder version written simultaneously with different frames from identical data
Data retrieval, framing, and formatting handled automatically from connected program systems
Report delivered to board a week before the meeting with full review time available
Funder compliance report ready the same day as the board version, not two weeks later
Donor impact statement generated from CRM cross-reference and included in board version automatically
15 minutes per quarter on reporting review. 45 hours per year returned to fundraising.

How Long Does Your Current Board Reporting Process Take?

What would your team do with those hours back every quarter?

Your Q1 Data Is Ready. Your Board Report Should Be Too. In 30 Seconds.

Get started and see Impact Summary Generator turn your program data into board-ready and funder-ready reports simultaneously.